I know I’m getting older for two reasons. First, not only do I like Judge Judy, I now like the way she looks. Second, for years I was a young Curmudgeon, but I have now passed beyond Curmudgeon to Crank. You don’t hit Crank until you have the years to back it up.
For example, I fired an actor last week who was the type that a few years back I would have indulged to no end. But now I’ve learned to trust my nose – when something smells it smells. And much of what people do to us and to the Church is not at first overtly inappropriate, but something that smells. The smoke of Satan that has infiltrated the Church has an odor to it.
Thus, when you research a religious order and find a website devoted to “peace and justice”, there’s a kind of stink you recognize. Now peace and justice are wonderful things, but they are wonderfully misused by the enemy. When you later discover that this order has a center devoted to “respect for Mother Earth”, your suspicions are confirmed.
But this is not a popular strategy to pursue. I have been criticized on this blog for being critical of smelly homilies; any time I point out bad behavior by bishops, I get slammed; and it’s never safe to make fun of Catholic Schools Week, a self-congratulatory exercise in banality that reeks to high heaven.
It’s just not easy being a Crank! Especially when those around you have lost their olfactory sense – which means they can’t smell.
But we need to follow our noses and to realize the atmosphere that surrounds them. As Chesterton says in What’s Wrong with the World, “Our age is, at best, a poetical epoch, an age of prejudice. A doctrine is a definite point; a prejudice is a direction.” The modern erosion of rational thought brings about an atmosphere of prejudice, of mood. We find ourselves fogged in. And lost in the fog of drift, told by all around us that definition is wrong; that distinction uncaring; that discrimination in its intellectual sense is as bad as discrimination in its racial sense; weighed down by the atmosphere that surrounds us and eventually inured to its smell, we find ourselves both excusing and worshipping at The Church of the Vague Sentiment.
Chesterton continues: “Against this there is no weapon at all except a rigid and steely sanity, a resolution not to listen to fads, and not to be infected by diseases. In short, the rational human faith must armor itself with prejudice in an age of prejudices, just as it armored itself with logic in an age of logic.”
So if I have begun, in my dotage, to exercise not only the faculty of judgment, but also a bit of pre-judgment, it’s because it’s served me well. On the battleground one does not ordinarily give the benefit of the doubt to a suspected insurgent. We have been cowed into ignoring the warning signs; we have been holding our noses so long out of deference to our unwashed neighbors that we forget “if it looks like a duck and flies like a duck and quacks like a duck” – and especially, I might add, if it smells like a duck – “it’s a duck”.
May I take this moment to rail on PSR, or Pure S*** Religion, which is euphemistically called Parish School of Religion?
One of the “exercises” my child was subjected to at the PSR school was to get on all fours, pretend to be a dog, and lick a schoolgirl on the forearm, after which he was supposed to bite a fellow male student on the leg. To my relief as a father, he refused to follow further instructions at this point, and, instead, came home to tell me about the incident. Now, I’d like to talk to our parish priest about this failure of his teachers, both with respect to the hygiene of our children, and the incredibly erroneous catechesis here. There is a complete failure to distinguish Christ-like humility from humiliation, not to mention the fact that this lesson constitutes child abuse.
He is in his confirmation year, and is also being subjected to “Confirmation Class.” Amazingly, after three months, the Catechism of the Catholic Church has not been mentioned. There have been many opinions offered by his teachers, none based on the catechism. One of these opinions was that “you should only date someone to determine whether or not you are going to marry them.” When my son, in eigth grade, asked “Why can’t we just date for fun?”, he was met with a stony “That’s not what I think dating’s for.”
What gives these people the right to tell my son “what they think” about Catholicism, when they clearly have no background in the Catechism of the Church?
First of all…HA! The first paragraph made me laugh. 🙂
And the rest… AMEN to that! Too many doors are left cracked open, allowing “satan’s smoke” to drift in when the door should have been slammed shut the moment we saw (or smelled) whose face was on the other side.
God gave us a conscience and as long as we are keepin it (and our olfactory sense) in tip top shape through confession, we should listen to it.
P.S. I guess I’m still young…I don’t even like to look at judge Judy! 🙂